SHIPS OF POISON: THE COMMITTEE OF THE DE GRACE INTERROGATE PRESTIGIACOMO All associations Amantea organizers of the event last October 24, asking that it be provided to the Ministry of the documentary evidence of marine exploration and laboratory testing performed on samples taken from the ship "Ocean Sea" which operated off Cetraro to detect the possible presence of a ship loaded with radioactive waste as revealed by sources regretted.
Waiting to assess directly, through technicians trust and comparative analysis, asking to dispel all doubts and perplexities addensatisi on a story full of contradictions. And to bring this to the Minister Prestigiacomo the following questions:
1 - How can a person not of the place, as Francis Wells, was aware of the presence of a wreck in the seabed of Cetraro exactly the place you found?
2 - Why this wreck, if known by the Navy and Coast Guard, was not reported in due course of the investigation to the Attorney Giordano owner?
3 - Why are there differences between the characteristics of the wreck of the steamship Cetraro and Catania? The latter, according to the manufacturers' data, was 95.8 meters long and the official length of the wreck, comunicata dal Governo, è pari a 103 metri. I dati differenti del piroscafo Catania sono ben noti e riportati nel registro navale della World Ship Society e pubblicati dal sito specializzato Miramar Ship Index. Gli stessi identici dati sono pubblicati anche sul sito specializzato nella storia degli U-boat (www.uboat.net).
4 - Perché dai registri navali risulta che il piroscafo Catania venne affondato almeno a 3,2 miglia di distanza dal punto dove la “Mare Oceano” stava effettuando le verifiche. Un punto più a largo di circa cinque chilometri, non qualche centinaio di metri.
5 - Come mai le foto e le riprese video effettuate dal Rov della Nave Oceano sembrerebbero diverse da quelle realizzate dal Rov dell’Arpacal?
6 - Why has not yet been made public throughout the movie made by Rov georeferenced of the Ocean Sea?
7 - Why did the Minister, even before it emerges from the Rov of Geolab waters, announced that the wreck could not be that of Cetraro Cunsky?
8 - What happened to the drums or windsocks Rov sent back by the Region of Calabria, and why have not been recovered and brought to the surface to test the alleged truth?
9 - Why is the Minister Prestigiacomo has been said that the "case closed" without even sure of the ship's cargo?
10 - Why were only reported data on the radioactivity of the analysis carried out 300 meters depth in spite of the wreck is at over 480 meters? This difference has a significant effect since the gamma radiation have a different screen depending on depth. For example 170 meters generate a level of shielding by a factor of 3 * E126. So even in the presence of several pits of nuclear reactors and radioactive contamination is not easily detectable.
11 - Why, despite the formal request from the Calabria region, has not been communicated to the Protocol adopted to carry out scientific tests on the wreckage on the seabed and the surrounding waters?
12 - Why were not performed at the outset, the necessary investigations into the food chain of animals fish and sediments of the seabed in order to detect the presence of radionuclides and / or contaminants of various kinds? This is to reassure the public in case of any feedback negative or vice versa proclaim a state of emergency in order to make use of the compensation in case of positive feedback (in the light of previous investigations that have feared such a possibility)?
13 - Why the story of the wreck of Cetraro was adopted a different approach from that used for the investigation of contaminated material found in the valley Olive where the analysis will be conducted on samples taken from four different laboratories, while on the ship Ocean is not was allowed to enter, if not for a few hours, the researchers dell'Arpacal?
14 - Why such a hurry to close the investigation and send away the ship and ocean, given the local presence of the boat, he would have continued to sound throughout the surrounding sea Cetraro?
15 - Why the Port of Cetraro in 2007 gave the order for prohibition of fishing for a few hundred meters from the place indicated by sources, after trials carried dall'Arpacal which indicated the presence of heavy metals such as alarming ' arsenic, cobalt and chromium on fish? And why that ordinance was withdrawn a year later? It would be useful to communicate the results of that analysis.
16 - Why have not been applied even in Cetraro recent legislation (Law 123/2008 and Law 210/2008) which are classified as strategic sites of national interest in areas where toxic wastes are disposed of or identified and / or harmful?
ask the Minister Prestigiacomo whether he is aware of the movies made in 2005 - 2006 on behalf of the Attorney Paola company Nautilus and ask what they have filmed and to publicize these films.
17 - Why to comment on the results of the findings made by the vessel Ocean were the Attorney General and Minister Prestigiacomo DNA Pietro Grasso, and not the owner of the investigations?
associations, committees and the organizers of the movement 24 October Amantea: Civic Committee
Christmas De Grazia / Environmentalist Movement of the Tyrrhenian Sea / Environmental Forum / Common Goods Cosenza / Red Cetraro / WWF-Belmonte C. Amantea / Paolab Association / Association Compare / Civic Committee Oliva Valley Lands to Lose / CGIL Amantea / CIB Unicobas / Kill All anti-mafia movement